What we observe
We read the text of the pages we read for claims that need support, such as comparisons, promised outcomes, claims of authority, pricing claims and urgency, and note when the page carries no support for them.
Why it is here: the evidence
Fact only No platform document and no independent study says it matters. We record it because it is true of the site, so it is never offered as advice about AI.
Source: No AI vendor documents what it weighs before acting; recorded as a fact. Source grade C: nothing published shows that AI systems use it.
Last re-checked ; due again within 30 days.
What we cannot see
Whether a claim is true. We report the words on the page, never that a claim is false.
Why there is no advice here
Recorded as a fact; no platform documents that it matters to AI systems, so this page gives no advice about it.
Where it matters for the people who visit a site, its own area covers it: Claims & trust.
- Layer
- Trust: What can an automated visitor see that a careful person would check before acting?
- Level
- Not part of any level.
- Where its finding lives
- Claims & trust
- How common it is
- Not published yet. We publish a share only once at least 30 sites stand behind it.
- Check id
chk-claims
Cite as: Invara, “How AI sees your site”, method version 1, check chk-claims. https://clearsitedigital.com/how-ai-sees-sites/chk-claims